RSSInterested in linking to "Higher Ground —Part I, II and III"?
You may use the Headline, Deck, Byline and URL of this article on your Web site. To link to this article, select and copy the HTML code below and paste it on your own Web site.
Higher Ground —Part I, II and III
Three-Part Discussion About What Users and Developers Call Higher-Level Languages and How They Vary in Performance and Suitability
11/11/2008
To cast your vote, log in or become a member. This quick, one-time registration gives you access to members-only site benefits.
1 vote
Higher Ground—Part I
Part I discusses what users and developers call higher-level languages and how they vary in performance and suitability.
Higher Ground—Part II
Part II continues the discussion onwhat users and developers call higher-level programming languages and how they vary in performance and suitability. High-level control languages help speed development cycles, but a preferred language for machine control hasn’t emerged
Higher Ground—Part III
This is the final part of our three-part discussion. Languages like ladder logic are more common, but higher-level languages can supervise machine controls and interface with a C-based OS.
 Sprechen Sie Python?Well, maybe not Python, but how do you define a higher-level language? Is it based on how much the programmer is isolated from the actual code? Is it about a more-powerful control capability? Discuss at ControlDesign.com/language. |
To cast your vote, log in or become a member. This quick, one-time registration gives you access to members-only site benefits.
1 vote
ControlDesign.com is the only multimedia source dedicated to the controls, instrumentation, and automation information needs of industrial machine builders, those original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) that build the machines that make industry work.
