Integrate Safety, Improve Productivity

Metal-Stamping Machine Builder Uses an Integrated Control Architecture to Punch Up Performance

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page

By Joe Feeley, Editor in Chief

Safety can play a big role in improving machine uptime and productivity. Safe, well-protected operators are more able to keep their machines running and a well-integrated safety system actually can enhance the machine’s productivity potential while protecting it from possible damage.

Some companies, builders and users alike, still regard machine safety as an afterthought to be minimally dealt with as a separate, unwanted cost item. Quigg International does not appear to be one of those companies.

When automotive or aerospace companies talk to Quigg International about an automated metal-stamping system, the company is eager to show how its innovative machine design and advanced technology can deliver a return on investment that it’s convinced will pay for the upfront costs.

The system integrator, located in Tecumseh, Ontario, specializes in implementing industrial automation—ranging from motion control to safety systems—for metal-stamping applications. Vice president Joe Quigg says his team understands that customers come to them with the need to improve machine performance and reduce costs.

Recently, a major automotive client looked to upgrade the automation and controls on an existing stamping press, improve employee safety, and meet the compliance demands of Canadian safety standards. It asked Quigg International to help them achieve these objectives.

The additional coordination and communication code required by disparate systems is eliminated in this integrated architecture. The benefits are less code to engineer, write and debug at the SI level and less to wade through at the user site when troubleshooting.

Much Too Manual

On the customer’s the original system, a forklift operator loaded sheets of steel next to an operator loading station. The operator manually loaded the steel onto the stamping press one piece at a time. While this might have been accepted practice in the past, it put the operator close to the most dangerous part of the machine.

“We determined to add a robot on the front end to do the high-speed, heavy lifting of steel onto the stamping press and move the human operator out of the hazardous area,” says Quigg. “This would allow operators to supervise the robot from a safer distance and help make sure the line will operate smoothly.”

The Quigg team set out to find a control system solution that would integrate these three disparate control disciplines into a single integrated system.

Three Goes Into One Fine

“This type of system previously would use three different control mechanisms—one each for safety, motion and automation—and each would require its own hardware, training and software, all of which increase operating costs for a company,” says Quigg. The motion requirement actually was comprised of two different aspects of the job, he adds. “We needed robot control for the load/unload sequences, plus control of the coil-feeder function.”

Quigg looked at several options and selected Rockwell Automation based on the integrated control system it offered. “Of everything we considered, Rockwell Automation offered the best turn-key solution to tightly integrate the three systems required for this application,” states Quigg. “The benefits promised to be less engineering and faster start up. We felt it would be the easiest to use and Rockwell has the best product and application support available local for us and our customer.”

The Quigg team worked with Rockwell Automation to leverage the supplier’s Integrated Architecture, which integrates safety, automation and motion into one control platform and uses one software program and, says Quigg, one set of spare parts. “Because automation, motion and safety are all part of the integrated architecture, many of the components are common,” he adds. “One power supply handles safety, motion and automation, one chassis houses these components with access to common I/O, plus common cables and common communications.”

The new system also handled both the robot and coil feeder motion requirements. “That was done using the embedded motion in the new control system,” says Quigg. “This functionality is not common in a controller that also is handling the high-speed tasks of a safety application.”

The upgrade included an Allen-Bradley GuardLogix controller with Kinetix Integrated Motion, EtherNet/IP communications, PanelView + operator interface and RSLogix 5000 software to program the automation, motion control and safety functionality in one environment. GuardLogix controllers and Kinetix Integrated Motion are part of the Logix control platform.

Quigg says the platform provides his engineers with multidiscipline control with common programming, common networks, and common control engine, along with integrated Safety Integrity Level (SIL) 3 control, in a single environment.

Using the GuardLogix controller and implementing Category 4 safety circuitry allowed Quigg’s team to build a machine with Guardmaster interlocking devices to help prevent personnel from entering hazardous areas of the machine. “This allows the robot and automated press controls to run production without the typical slowdowns caused when operators need to enter potentially dangerous areas,” adds Quigg.

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page
Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.


No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments