How to Design Better-Performing and More Reliable Machines?

April 16, 2014

Are data acquisition capabilities of PACs and newer PLCs a better path to use when designing better machines than standalone DAQ systems?

As our machine controls grow more sophisticated and powerful, we think that we can and should provide additional data acquisition and monitoring capabilities beyond routine speed and rotational condition monitoring. We want to help willing customers obtain useful, real-time operating data, but we also want to capture some key operating variables that will help us design better-performing and more reliable machines. We've used standalone DAQ systems and now are considering whether the data acquisition capabilities of PACs and newer PLCs might be a better path. We'd like to hear from others who have experience with both.

Sponsored Recommendations

Automation technology continues to advance the capabilities of packaging equipment.This new State of Technology Report from the editors of Control Design covers the ways packaging...
Protecting processes from explosive risks is a matter of life and property. Ensure electrical safety in hazardous locations by installing solutions certified to IEC and NEC standards...
Transform your machine's safety system. Discover how to upgrade with configurable products, scalable designs, and simplified wiring for improved diagnostics and long-term reliability...
Unlock the benefits of ASi with our Engineer’s Guide: Learn how to reduce wiring, cut costs, and improve flexibility in your automation systems.