You've got the power—pick one

Will it be pneumatics, hydraulics or servos? Industrial automation veteran Wayne Labs says to first do your homework before choosing a motion control system, then decide.

By Wayne Labs

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page
PNEUMATIC AND HYDRAULIC TECHNOLOGY AS PRIMARY disciplines have been part of the machine builder landscape for a very long time. There still are vast armadas of these machines performing admirably in factories all over the world. Now, to many automation gurus, this might seem to be an increasingly old-fashioned approach in a world of electronic servo motors and digital controls, but those solutions are not nearly as antiquated as some might think.

With modern position sensors and closed-loop control methods, servo-pneumatics fulfill more than traditional bang-bang stroke applications, while servo-hydraulic systems can position heavy weights with accuracy and precision. They both have a few drawbacks, but for well-chosen applications the benefits will outweigh the problems.

Heavy-Lifting Hydraulics
Hydraulic-power solutions are great for heavy lifting or where extreme applied pressure is required, such as for powdered-metal press operations. Typically, powdered metal is dropped into a mold, called a die. An upper cylinder pushes a "punch" into the die area and compresses the powder. "Pressures depend on the machine's size, but can range up to 750 tons," says Scott Green, president of Alpha Lehigh Tool and Machine Co. (www.alphalehigh.com), Phillipsburg, N.J. The compact powder particle mass that holds the shape of the die is pushed out of the die and then baked in an oven similar to a ceramics kiln. The metal particles bond at the grain and molecular level,a microscopic welding process known as sintering.

"We refurbish presses to modern standards and use a closed-loop control system to operate proportional valves that control the amount of oil to the upper and lower ram cylinders," says Green. "Magnetic transducers on the upper and lower ram cylinders supply position feedback to the computer. The computer system provides greater flexibility with upper and lower ram movements, and greater flexibility and synchronization with the feeder system,the system that moves the powder into the mold or die."

With these servo-hydraulics, says Delta Computers CEO, Steve Nylund, the system can position down to the resolution of the transducer,in the micron range,and do it accurately and repeatedly. "You can apply huge amounts of force, and do it more safely than with pneumatics," he says. "Hydraulic actuators are smaller than their electrical servo cousins, and are a real benefit when a machine builder has a limited amount of space, but needs to apply large forces accurately."

There are transducers that are well-suited to hydraulic applications. For example, magnetostrictive transducers can be inserted into a hydraulic cylinder,the combination making an excellent actuator-feedback system. But industry professionals say there are special control considerations for hydraulic systems. Hydraulic cylinders typically are built as single-end devices. The forces on the rod side and its opposite end are unequal, so gains in the controller have to be scaled to work with hydraulic systems.

Servo-Pneumatics: A Control Challenge
Hydraulics are usually recognized as a good solution when it comes to those heavy applications, but some machine builders are moving away from it. Bill Schap of Schap Specialty Machine, Spring Lake, Mich., says servo-pneumatics makes more sense for the seating test equipment systems his company builds for the automotive industry and major furniture manufacturers. "We've been doing servo loops for 15 years or more, and we're making a concerted effort to get away from hydraulics," says Schap. "They're noisy, they leak, and they're expensive. Where they do work well, however, is where there's a need for a large static load. But for the most part, low-end hydraulic applications easily can be replaced by pneumatics and servo-pneumatic systems."

According to Schap, he's been working with Enfield Techologies since its proportional pneumatic valve came out a decade ago. When it was first available, he says, it was intended for holding position on pneumatic cylinders with position feedback. "For our applications, we closed the loop with a load cell instead of a position sensor. We've done more than a hundred systems like that over the past 10 years. Many of those systems used up to 16 cylinders,all closed loop, all running independently to a single PC,with good results."

Enfield's LS Series servo-pneumatic control system runs open or closed loop, includes a dedicated device controller and features a five-port, three-position closed-center directional valve. Company president Ed Howe notes that the convergent controller circuitry provides real-time command and feedback signal monitoring with a less than 100 ?sec response time. While the system was designed for proportional pneumatic control, it can also be used in speed applications with a total cycle time of 5 ms for a complete open and close of one port.

As with hydraulic cylinders, pneumatic cylinders can be teamed with various position sensors to provide feedback to a controller. Potentiometers generally are low-cost devices, about a third the cost of other sensors. Since they require physical contact with the actuator, lifetimes are shorter than non-contact devices. Magnetostrictive sensors provide absolute position information and non-contact service, but can range in price from $300 to more than a $1,000, depending on length and application. While inductive sensors cost less than magnetostrictive sensors and don't have to contact moving parts, they are not as accurate as magnetostrictive devices.

The challenge, according to Nylund, is the controller itself. Most pneumatic systems today still use dumb controllers. "We see an opportunity for smarter pneumatic controllers, but they have to deal with the non-linear aspects of the varying compressibility of the medium," he states. "Controllers will need to have a variety of sensor inputs to monitor and control not just position, but force and pressure as well."

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page
Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.

Comments

No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments