3,000 Kilometers of Cable Connect Detector

World's Largest Silicon Tracking Detector in CERN’s CMS Experiment Requires Three Patch-Panel Breakpoints for Installation

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page

With a total surface area of 205 m², about the same as a singles tennis court, a silicon strip tracking detector was installed in CERN’s Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) Experiment in Switzerland this past December. CERN is the European Organization for Nuclear Research (cern.ch).

The CMS Experiment, which has involved more than 500 scientists and engineers from 51 research institutions, uses a detector built around a huge solenoid magnet—a cylindrical coil of superconducting cable that generates a magnetic field of 4 teslas, about 100,000 times that of Earth.


Sensors Working Overtime
The world’s largest tracking detector has a surface area the size of a singles tennis court and uses 3,000 km of fiberoptic cable to transfer data.
Photo by CERN
The giant detector is another piece in place in CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, which will be the world’s largest particle accelerator when it becomes operational this spring. “The complete system operating at the LHC will produce data at a higher rate than the entire global telephone system,” says project manager Peter Sharp.

Three families of signals are transferred from the heart of the detector to the back-end electronics, located in a dedicated service cavern. “The fibers and wires connect the front-end devices, such as readout chips, control electronics and all the rest of the various sensing elements, to the back-end electronics—the readout system and control system,” says Dr. Duccio Abbaneo of the CERN physics department.

The 40,000-channel Tracker fiber plant is a sub-detector of CMS. Digital control signals drive the readout electronics. Analog environmental signals are generated by temperature, humidity, current and voltage-sensing devices located inside the detector. Analog physics signals are generated by the tracking detectors. The control and physics signals travel on fibers, while the environmental signals travel on wires together with the power lines.

“The control signals and physics signals are transferred with the optical link,” says Abbaneo. “Opto-electrical conversion is performed inside the detector as close as possible to the readout ASICs and at the back end where signals are processed by the readout and electronic control boards.”

The environmental signals are transferred via electrical lines integrated with the power lines into custom-designed, multi-conductor cables, explains Abbaneo. “The cables are broken in a patch panel located outside the tracking volume but still inside the CMS detector,” he says. “In the section from the front-end electronics to the patch panel, about 5 m long and, partially inside the tracking volume, the power-carrying main conductors are made of an aluminum-based alloy to limit the mass inside the tracker. The section from the patch panel to the power supply racks, about 30 m long, has copper lines with larger total cross section, to minimize the impedance.”

Lines carrying the environmental signals are then routed from the power supply racks to the appropriate processing devices. In both types of cables, the data lines are shielded from the power lines within each cable, and an outer shield surrounds all the lines to screen the noise of the environment. “The importance of cable shielding has been proven experimentally, as the noise level in the physics data has been observed to depend, in some cases, on how and where the cable shields are connected to Earth,” explains Abbaneo.

Fiber, Fiber Everywhere

The system uses standard single-mode Corning SMF28 fiberoptic cable supplied by Ericsson as either single-fiber (approximately 40 km inside the Tracker), 12-way ribbon cable (approximately 24 km inside the Tracker) or 96-way multiribbon cable (approximately 30 km inside CMS). All fiberoptic cables have been pre-terminated with a variety of connectors or fiber lengths depending on the part of the system concerned. Three breakpoints exist in the system where custom patch-panels are designed to make installation of this large system easier.

Data transfer capacity of the Tracker fiberoptic system is specified and tested to be able to collect data from all 10 million detector channels of the silicon strip tracker at a rate of 100 kHz, the equivalent to 13 terabits/sec. “The links are assumed to operate for several thousand hours per year,” says Dr. Karl Gill, Abbaneo’s physics department colleague at CERN. “The individual fibers are nowhere near their intrinsic capacity, but the sheer number of detector modules requires a highly distributed system with many channels. These first raw data transferred out of the Tracker are then filtered, or zero-suppressed, by custom electronics boards, and only the particle signals and their addresses and time stamps are kept.”

About 50 Gbits/sec are transferred to the central data acquisition system via another CMS-wide system of fiberoptic cable, explains Gill. These data are filtered at various levels, and only about 5 MB/sec of Tracker data is stored permanently along with other data from the other CMS sub-detectors.

Analyze This

Environmental data, as well as information on the status of auxiliary systems such as cooling plants or nitrogen ventilation, are processed by the detector control system and the detector safety system to monitor the correct functioning of the detector and, in case of severe anomalies, trigger automatic actions such as switching off the power if overheating results from a failure in the cooling system, explains Abbaneo.

“Such data are stored in a dedicated database and also will be used for specialized analyses aimed at a precise characterization of the detector environment during data taking,” he says. “Finally, information on the status of the power system, readout system, control system and selected environmental information are used to define the data quality flags.” Data recorded with parts of the detector malfunctioning need to be flagged and discarded or processed in a special way, says Ball. If the detector anomalies were not registered and correctly accounted for, they could cause misleading interpretations of the data.

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page
Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.


No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments