What Are Machine Builders' Wireless Options?

Technology Can Deliver Low-Power Wireless Sensing, But There Are Challenges Such as Range, Rate, Power and Encryption to Consider

By Control Design Staff

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page

We'll save ourselves and our customers some significant money by using wireless sensors in places to connect a battery of machines across varying distances, many nearly 1000-ft distant. First issue: The sampling rates will vary from 10/sec to 1/sec, with some others transmitting on status change only. So it looks like we have options for powering the sensors. At these rates, can we economically use energy-harvesting methods? What's the general state of battery life for these conditions? There even are a few spots where photovoltaics (PV) is an option. Second issue: We heard that the level of encryption (say 128-bit) has a big effect on battery life, which no one seems to want to talk about. Any practical advice for these issues?

—from March '14 Control Design


Check Your Data Rate Needs

Technology can deliver low-power wireless sensing, but there are challenges such as range, rate, power and encryption to consider.

An excellent way to extend range is with wireless meshing technology. Mesh solutions based on 802.15.4e are far more robust and resilient than 802.15.4, and they'll provide the most flexibility and reliability. A 1,000-ft. range is workable, although environmental factors such as RF interference, frequency choice and the presence of physical objects in the line of sight will affect the range. To get the maximum range, you'll need an external antenna, rather than an on-board chip antenna. Gain and antenna type (directional or omni) will be determined by the local environment.

Ten samples per second is a high rate for a battery-powered sensor node. Do you require that much raw data for the application? You can preserve a lot of battery power if you push some event processing out to the sensor nodes and let them make decisions about how much data really needs to be transmitted. If high data rates are truly required, some wireless technologies will prove to be impractical.

Consider the total amount of data that will pass through the system. The total number of nodes, combined with their sampling rates, will determine the bandwidth that the system design must be able to handle.

Sampling rates heavily influence power budgets. As the sampling rate rises, you're looking at either larger batteries or shorter battery replacement intervals. Note that the industrial process world has gotten good results with WirelessHART. Many products boast multi-year battery life in applications that call for several samples per minute using just one or two D-cell lithium batteries.

Also Read: Color Sensors Displace Older Methods

Energy harvesting is becoming more viable all the time, but it does call for careful system choices. Photovoltaic power (PV) is still the most practical option, and it works well outdoors. Indoor PV provides much less power. It can work, but only in applications with lower sampling rates and lower range requirements.

To your second issue: encryption adds overhead. How much overhead will depend on data payload packet size. Always factor encryption overhead into the power and bandwidth budget specified by the vendor. And don't take chances with the "security by obscurity" rationale, where security depends on the secrecy of the system's implementation or its components. That's like thinking you can leave your back door unlocked because a burglar can't see it from the street.

Mike Fahrion,
Director of Product Management,
B&B Electronics

[The following response came as a result of posting the question to our own Control Design LinkedIn Group.]

Saving Money Isn't the Big Factor

From my personal experience with wireless instruments and sensors, the majority of these types of instruments have non-rechargeable batteries. Unless you have a huge amount in backup for them, you can't guarantee a continuous measurement of your process. On the other hand, it's the responsibility of a capable technical service group to ensure the minimum power consumption via device configuration.

Finally, saving money must not be a factor when you decide to use wireless instruments. The money that you save in installation and engineering might be spent in medium term by replacing batteries and paying for technical service.

I've seen that the only advantage about wireless instruments is if they can be locally powered by PV solutions or by ensuring continuous power from any power source.

Javier Ernesto Otálora Sánchez,
Control Design Engineer,
Genser Power

[These are responses received when we posted the question to LinkedIn's Industrial Automation & Process Controls group.]

Don't Worry About the Encryption Overhead

With the technology on the market today, you have a choice between proprietary wireless products or those conforming to a standard. Both ISA100 Wireless and WirelessHART conform to standards (different ones). Both use AES-128 encryption. Battery life for both depends on the frequency of transmission. ISA100 is capable of transmitting 10/sec, but not WirelessHART. Typically, battery life can be expected to be between one and five years. Either one can be powered by energy-harvesting devices, especially those using the ISA100.18 specification for energy-harvesting power connection. Reducing the length of the encryption key will have no effect on the power consumption, but you can't do it with current products anyway.

Dick Caro, Industrial Networking Consultant,

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page
Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.


No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments