Help Our Reader Choose: Managed or Unmanaged Switch?

We would like to set up all our PLCs and Fanuc Robots onto an Ethernet system, and get rid of the old-fashioned hardwired I/O going between all four PLCs and robots. The question came up asking if we would want managed or unmanaged switches.

I am not sure which to use and why you choose one over the other. If it helps, here is a list of what we have for the particular cell we are looking at converting over to Ethernet.

  • Four separate cabinets, each with its own Q Series PLC. One of the PLCs has CC-Link going to remote I/O.
  • Four separate Fanuc Robot controllers. Each has an Ethernet option.

All the PLCs and robots are talking by hard-wire interlocking. (Many failure points - the robots do not talk directly to each other but only to the PLCs; the PLC is more like a traffic cop that looks at the robot outputs and then sends outputs from the PLC to inputs of the proper robot).

We would like to add possibly four HMIs to the cell, remove three of the four PLCs, and have the robots on Ethernet to PLCs and each other. We would like to integrate remote I/O with Ethernet blocks, and also send data onto the server for production counts.

Any advice from anyone with experience in this is appreciated!

Send us your comments, suggestions or solutions to this problem in the comment section of this blost post. Follow our LinkedIn group, where you can also post your answer to this discussion there!

">
Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.

Comments

  • <p>I came accross this website to read more info on this great product: <a href="http://www.directindustry.com/industrial-manufacturer/unmanaged-switch-86290.html">http://www.directindustry.com/industrial-manufacturer/unmanaged-switch-86290.html</a> </p>

    Reply

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments