How to Design Better-Performing and More Reliable Machines?
April 16, 2014
Are data acquisition capabilities of PACs and newer PLCs a better path to use when designing better machines than standalone DAQ systems?
As our machine controls grow more sophisticated and powerful, we think that we can and should provide additional data acquisition and monitoring capabilities beyond routine speed and rotational condition monitoring. We want to help willing customers obtain useful, real-time operating data, but we also want to capture some key operating variables that will help us design better-performing and more reliable machines. We've used standalone DAQ systems and now are considering whether the data acquisition capabilities of PACs and newer PLCs might be a better path. We'd like to hear from others who have experience with both.
Discover how IO-Link-enabled piezoelectric vibration sensors are transforming machine health monitoring offering deeper insights, fewer installation hurdles, and smarter maintenance...
Get some peace of mind and a higher level of protection into your machine designs with a comprehensive guide to machine safety. From the evolution of integrated safety logic to...
Cut through the complexity of machine design. Beckhoff's cabinet-free automation platform is transforming the industry, simplifying builds and reducing costs. This modular approach...
