Front End Design - A Good Beginning = Successful End

Dec. 16, 2009

Everyone knows that no building is stronger than its foundation or a company better than its corporate principles so it should be no surprise that a project will be no more successful than the planning that takes place at the start of the project. This is certainly true for any industrial installation and in particular an industrial communications project.

There are many opportunities to either take advantage of, or undermine the many benefits of digital plant networks during the Front End Design either through missed opportunities or simple errors/oversights.

Everyone knows that no building is stronger than its foundation or a company better than its corporate principles so it should be no surprise that a project will be no more successful than the planning that takes place at the start of the project. This is certainly true for any industrial installation and in particular an industrial communications project.

There are many opportunities to either take advantage of, or undermine the many benefits of digital plant networks during the Front End Design either through missed opportunities or simple errors/oversights.

Typical missed opportunities include:

- Not making use of multivariable field devices (this saves on process connections, device purchases, field terminations, associated design…) however if the Main Automation Contractor also supplies the field devices, what incentive do they have to sell you less equipment?

- Using "traditional" work practices for new work and design requirements. (Loop diagrams versus Segment diagrams, equipment procurement, etc.)

- New techniques to minimise field construction costs ("palm tree" versus "branched tree" networks, panel prefabrication/modular construction, etc.)

- Security and access with associated policy development.

- Work practices – how will the ability to communicate to field devices as part of the network affect your work practices? (a change in the field device is now propagated through to the control system and vice versa)

- Your experience and suggestions please?

Of course, the further along in a project that a change is made the more expensive it becomes, in part because of the necessary rework, but also because there is a cascade effect to other engineering disciplines. Experience has shown that as you progress from FED to Basic engineering a change increases by an order of magnitude.

Of course the key to avoid these mistakes is a combination of experience (which may mean bringing in consultants as mentors) and training. Many is the company who upon completion of their first or second ‘new technology" project who state, "We would have been more successful if we had done more training earlier in the project."

This blog entry was originally submited by IanVerhappen to The Great Kanduski: Best Practices in Industrial Networking

Sponsored Recommendations

Boost Material Handling Operations with the New Assist Wheel Drive

Transportation and material moving are repeatedly among the most frequent workplace injuries and also a leading cause of days away from work, job transfers, or restrictions. Learn...

EV Battery Pack Manufacturing with AC Servos and Robotics

This white paper from Yaskawa examines the increase in demand for electric vehicle (EV) batteries and explores different steps in their manufacturing process where AC servos and...

2024 State of Technology Report: HMIs, IPCs and Enclosures

The human-machine interface, the industrial PC and the enclosure are three of the most evolutionary components in an industrial control strategy. No devices have changed more ...

Evolution of Motion Control Guide

Learn more about advances in motor control in this helpful guide.