Front End Design - A Good Beginning = Successful End

Dec. 16, 2009

Everyone knows that no building is stronger than its foundation or a company better than its corporate principles so it should be no surprise that a project will be no more successful than the planning that takes place at the start of the project. This is certainly true for any industrial installation and in particular an industrial communications project.

There are many opportunities to either take advantage of, or undermine the many benefits of digital plant networks during the Front End Design either through missed opportunities or simple errors/oversights.

Everyone knows that no building is stronger than its foundation or a company better than its corporate principles so it should be no surprise that a project will be no more successful than the planning that takes place at the start of the project. This is certainly true for any industrial installation and in particular an industrial communications project.

There are many opportunities to either take advantage of, or undermine the many benefits of digital plant networks during the Front End Design either through missed opportunities or simple errors/oversights.

Typical missed opportunities include:

- Not making use of multivariable field devices (this saves on process connections, device purchases, field terminations, associated design…) however if the Main Automation Contractor also supplies the field devices, what incentive do they have to sell you less equipment?

- Using "traditional" work practices for new work and design requirements. (Loop diagrams versus Segment diagrams, equipment procurement, etc.)

- New techniques to minimise field construction costs ("palm tree" versus "branched tree" networks, panel prefabrication/modular construction, etc.)

- Security and access with associated policy development.

- Work practices – how will the ability to communicate to field devices as part of the network affect your work practices? (a change in the field device is now propagated through to the control system and vice versa)

- Your experience and suggestions please?

Of course, the further along in a project that a change is made the more expensive it becomes, in part because of the necessary rework, but also because there is a cascade effect to other engineering disciplines. Experience has shown that as you progress from FED to Basic engineering a change increases by an order of magnitude.

Of course the key to avoid these mistakes is a combination of experience (which may mean bringing in consultants as mentors) and training. Many is the company who upon completion of their first or second ‘new technology" project who state, "We would have been more successful if we had done more training earlier in the project."

This blog entry was originally submited by IanVerhappen to The Great Kanduski: Best Practices in Industrial Networking

Sponsored Recommendations

2025 State of Technology Report: HMIs, IPCs and Enclosures

Industrial manufacturing equipment often relies on human-machine interfaces, industrial PCs and enclosures to ensure system reliability and optimal performance. These components...

Custom Encoder Created for Large Rotational Applications

Large rotational applications like MRI machines, excavators, mobile equipment, forklifts and stagecraft require precise motion feedback for optimal performance, safety and efficiency...

See How One Company Customized Motion Feedback for Material Handling Applications

Encoders can be used in material handling on sorters, conveyors, in automated storage retrieval systems, on mobile equipment, automated mobile robots and more. See how one company...

Absolute vs Incremental Encoders: Which One Does Your System Need?

The right encoder makes all the difference. Incremental encoders are perfect for tracking speed and direction in dynamic motion. Absolute encoders? They remember exact positioning...