FDT, SAM & a Common Interface

Dec. 11, 2009
Those of you in the process analyser community are likely familiar with the New Sample System Initiative (NeSSI) that started with a modular sample system backplane defined in ISA standard 76.00.02 and the supporting work is being led by the Center for Process Analytic Chemistry (CPAC) at the University of Washington. More information on NeSSI can be found at http://www.cpac.washington.edu/NeSSI/NeSSI.htm. 

"
Those of you in the process analyser community are likely familiar with the New Sample System Initiative (NeSSI) that started with a modular sample system backplane defined in ISA standard 76.00.02 and the supporting work is being led by the Center for Process Analytic Chemistry (CPAC) at the University of Washington. More information on NeSSI can be found at http://www.cpac.washington.edu/NeSSI/NeSSI.htm. 

The NeSSI team is now working on the Objective 4 to “Lay the groundwork for Pipe to Pixel™ open connectivity architecture for intrinsically safe transducer communications and industry standard communication protocols.” and this is known by the acronym SAM – Sensor/Actuator Manager. SAM is to be the universal interface between the analytical backplane and the analyser network(s) including in some definitions the ability to be programmed and operate the sample system, definitely as a means to perform the maintenance and diagnostics of the sample preparation equipment.

Because SAM may need to support multiple different protocols, one alternative that should be considered is FDT http://fdt-group.org/ since with the right combination of Communication DTM’s and a single Style Guide it may just ‘do the trick’ with minimal new development/coding required by the analyser community and their suppliers. DTM’s are designed to provide calibration and maintenance information in a rich graphical environment so both organisations at least have that objective in common. Fortunately, these two groups are now in communication so time will tell how this works out. We’ll keep you informed as we learn more.

This blog entry was originally submitted by IanVerhappen to the The Great Kanduski: Best Practices in Industrial Networking Blog

Sponsored Recommendations

Programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and programmable automation controllers (PACs) provide viable options for machine control. This Control Design collection explains the differences...
Motion control engineers tend to focus on torque and speed specifications during the design process, but often fail to notice the unique features that differentiate a high-quality...
Covering the basics of choosing the right position feedback option for your application.
This white paper describes advantages of using advanced angle sensor technologies and focuses on best practices for correctly implementing non-­contact and touchless angle sensors...