How to Design Better-Performing and More Reliable Machines?

April 16, 2014

Are data acquisition capabilities of PACs and newer PLCs a better path to use when designing better machines than standalone DAQ systems?

As our machine controls grow more sophisticated and powerful, we think that we can and should provide additional data acquisition and monitoring capabilities beyond routine speed and rotational condition monitoring. We want to help willing customers obtain useful, real-time operating data, but we also want to capture some key operating variables that will help us design better-performing and more reliable machines. We've used standalone DAQ systems and now are considering whether the data acquisition capabilities of PACs and newer PLCs might be a better path. We'd like to hear from others who have experience with both.

Sponsored Recommendations

2024 State of Technology: Report: Sensors, Vision & Machine Safety

Manufacturing rarely takes place in a vacuum. Workers must be protected from equipment. And equipment must be protected. Sensing technology, vision systems and safety components...

Enclosure Cooling Primer

Learn more about enclosure cooling in this helpful primer.

Ultra-fast, ultra-accurate linear indexing

NSK integrates advanced automation and drive technologies to deliver high capacity, high speed, ultra-precise indexing and positioning in a compact, flexible linear actuator: ...

Non-Metallic Enclosures Compared to Metallic Enclosures

What you want from your enclosure is long-term, productive service. Knowing your application, enclosure materials and the environment in which it will be located will help.