Voices: Real Answers

Cooling Complications In Hazardous Locations

Are We Better Off With Conventional Gas-Purge Systems or Another Approach? We Need an Effective, but Still Cost-Responsible Solution

By Control Design Staff

We build most of our custom, one-off control cabinets in-house. We've had success using vortex coolers to control the enclosure temperatures when we have heat issues. Now we're getting into markets that place our systems in hazardous environments. What's the experience with adding purging capabilities to vortex coolers? Are we better off with conventional gas-purge systems or another approach? We need an effective, but still cost-responsible solution.

—from July '14 Control Design


A Common Solution

This is a very common solution for us. Most of the time customers prefer to use a purge system to protect their equipment over the use of an explosion-proof enclosure due to the large cost. The rating of the hazardous location that the enclosure is located in will determine which type of purge system you would need.

One concern customers have when adding a vortex cooler or AC unit to a purge system is over-pressurizing the enclosure. You just have to make sure that the vent used on the system can handle the combined air flow of the purge system and vortex cooler. Depending on your application, we have systems that can monitor the temperature inside of the enclosure, and turn the vortex cooler on or off depending on the temperature settings entered into our purge unit. So if you have an enclosure in a hazardous location, and it has a vortex cooler, then using a purge system is normally more cost-effective, and you get all of the extra benefits of the temperature monitoring and pressure compensation features.

Brent Dean,
Product Engineer,

[We received the following responses after posting the question on LinkedIn's Industrial Automation and Process Controls Network.]

Purge Will Have to Work Harder

Just use instrument air that is dry and filtered for the source of air for the vortex cooler. This would be the same source used for a purge system.

Also Read: Current Signal Conversion Experience

The purpose of the purge is to actually pressurize the enclosure to prevent the ingress of ignitable vapors. The vortex cooler will cause the purge to work harder, since it will have to make up pressure (just a few inches of water column) to compensate for the air that is constantly flowing through the enclosure via the vortex cooler. Contact your purge system vendor to ensure the purge has the capacity needed to offset the demand of the vortex cooler.  If possible, use all Div 2/Zone 2-rated components if you're placing the enclosure in a Div 1/Zone 1 environment. This will permit you to use a less-expensive Y purge instead of an X purge.

Robert Burgman,
Principal Engineer,

Electrical, Instrumentation and Process controls,

Good Combination

Is this for purging systems such as standard atmosphere or concentrated atmosphere such as nitrogen? General positive pressure designs would strike me as a great vortex combo application as long as you're not pushing moist air in. Any other gas would seem questionable. An exact application would help me answer with specifics.

Theodore Sharpe,
Machining Group Supervisor,
Ford Motor

Maybe Move the Enclosure

If you're a one-off manufacturer of an enclosure, you will find it difficult to satisfy the regulatory bodies that the enclosure meets the required rating for use in hazardous zones. Simply adding a purge is not sufficient. You have to contain or limit energy. Allowing the internals of your cabinet to vent, and thus forcing any energy out of the cabinet into the hazardous zone, is not acceptable. If all of your components and equipment are in their own hazardous-zone-rated enclosures, and you add a purge of sorts, also rated for hazardous zones, then you stand a chance of your entire installation being suitable for the hazardous-zone installation. If not, then I suggest that you just keep your enclosure out of the hazardous zones. Work with the site to determine your non-hazardous areas. They should have classification drawings that can guide you to where they are.

Andrew McKeown,
Specialist Process Engineer,
Carter Holt Harvey

Purge Controller Handles Both

We recently provided modifications to an existing customer panel. From the beginning, the customer wanted both a vortex cooler and purge controller.

Once the final installation was completed, our mutual conclusion was the purge controller could provide both functions—cooling and safety purge for C1/D1 area.

Jim Robinson,
Control Systems Engineer,
M.G. Newell

[We received these responses after posting the question on LinkedIn's Automation Engineers Group.]

Purge + Vortex Pepperl+Fuchs (Bebco) makes purge systems that can work in combination with vortex coolers. We use them at my shop, and it is a good product.

Noel Jull,
I&C designer,
IDT Systems

Vortex Gulps Air

Vortex coolers place quite a demand on an air system. I would use a purged enclosure per NFPA 496, and then use something like a Noren air-to-water heat exchanger approved for use with purged enclosures. This is how I've done it before.

Brian Rogers,
Senior Electrical Engineer,

Vortex Alone Works

I have no experience using a purge system in conjunction with a Vortec unit, but Vortec does make two units specifically for hazardous locations, the HazLoc Vortex A/C.
Here are links to the operating and safety instruction sheets: Operation and Safety Instructions Models 7515, 7525, 7535, 7215, 7225, 7235 and Models 7570, 7270, 7570BSP and 7270BSP. They have some useful information regarding sizing and using the two systems together.

Fred Manning,
Pneumatic Product Manager,

FCI Automation

They'll Work Independently

You can use the vortex cooler as part of purging systems, but you need to be aware of the fact that all the components that make up the purging system will operate independently from the vortex.

Also, you should use air where possible, since placing cooling or purge gases in contact with people could harm them.

Alejandro Varga Meder,
Project/Construction Management,
Devco USA

[We received this response after posting the question on LinkedIn's Automation.com Group.]

Vortex + Ex-n

On previous projects, per customer's requirement, we supplied IP65 stainless-steel panels with vortex coolers and Ex-n components.

This is not a cheap solution, but allows operating the cabinets with the doors open in any situation, including the presence of gas, not needing purging or de-powering.

George Eric Wootton,
E&A Solutions & Engineering Manager,
    Wärtsilä Brasil

[We received the following response after posting the question on LinkedIn's Panel Building and System Integration Group.]

Go Ahead

If you're asking can you use both a vortex cooler and a purge system for your hazardous location requirement, the answer is yes. It's not an uncommon practice.

If your heat dissipation is too great, explosion-protected air conditioning units can be used effectively. If heat is a smaller concern, sometimes just using continuous purge (versus compensative) can assist. Hope that helps. 

Craig Yoss,
Director of Marketing and Business Development,
R. Stahl

More From This Voice


Cooling Complications In Hazardous Locations

Are We Better Off With Conventional Gas-Purge Systems or Another Approach? We Need an Effective, but Still Cost-Responsible Solution


In With SSR? Out With EMR?

Are There Applications for Which There Are Justifiable Reasons not to Make This Change?


Any Termination Data on Field Connectors?

We Have Customers With Varying Preferences for the Method of Terminating Field Connections Outside the Panel. We Even Have Our Own Internal Disagreements. We Wanted to Simplify. See What Vendors Said:


Best DAQ Approach For Machine Controls?

Programmable Automation Controller (PAC) and Data Acquistion (DAQ) Systems Each Offer Unique Avantages in Terms of Information Access and in Granularity


What Are Machine Builders' Wireless Options?

Technology Can Deliver Low-Power Wireless Sensing, But There Are Challenges Such as Range, Rate, Power and Encryption to Consider


Is BYOD Inevitable in the Manufacturing Space?

Is it Inevitable that an RFQ Will Include Tablet or Smartphone Wireless HMI Requirements Some Day?


Experts Weigh in on Best Practices for Control Panel Housings

Design Uncertainties Can Arise From the Increasing Number of Devices in Control Panels Even When Regulations Are Followed to a Tee. Experts Discuss Solutions


How Do We Tone Down Machine Device Chatter?

Are There Standard or Standard-Based Approaches to Filter Networked Hardware and Components Nuisances?


Turn to Pneumatics or Direct-Drive Linear?

Which Offers the Best Bang for the Buck: A Direct Pneumatic Solution or an Integrated Linear Motor Package


Time to Slip Away From Slip Rings?

What Should Our Reader Know About Adding Wireless to Their Rotating Segments of Equipment in Tough, Noisy Environments?


Worry About End of XP Support?

With Microsoft to Stop the Support of Windows XP, What About OS Updates?


Time to Move to Digital Panel Meters?

Experts Share Experiences With Making the Move From Analog to Digital Panel Meters


Do We Future-Guard Machine Designs?

Will Designing Redundant Switches Up Front Forgo Future Problems, Liabilities and Added Costs?


Time for Electronic Circuit Protection?

Continuous Identification and Troubleshooting of Blown Circuits Cause Too Many Headaches for Our Reader


Is an Imaging Sensor Sensible?

How Will Precision and Accuracy Compare to Using a Presence Sensor?


Perplexed by Control Panel Builds

Should Our Reader Bring Its Building Jobs Back In-House or Do Custom One-Off Builds? Our Experts Give Their Advice


Should Machine-to-Machine Scare Us?

Will Implementing Device-Level Networks and Ethernet in Machines Help Your Customers?


Is Wireless the Right Solution?

What Are Readers' Experiences With Machine-Mount Wireless Controllers and I/O?


HMI: Form vs. Function?

Are Industrial Screens Beginning to Look More Like Smartphones?


Regen Drives Take the Heat, but Can They Turn Down the Cost?

What Happened to Pricing for VFDs and What's the ROI Particularly for Regenerative Drive Units?