Key Highlights
- Decentralized drive architectures simplify machine design, minimize wiring complexity and improve maintenance troubleshooting by mounting the VFD directly on or near the motor rather than inside a central control enclosure.
- While servo systems remain unmatched for high-precision positioning and ultra-fast dynamic response, advanced vector-controlled inverters have narrowed the performance gap, making induction motors a highly reliable, cost-effective alternative for simpler speed and torque applications.
- Driven by powerful digital processing, frequency inverters have transformed from basic speed-control hardware into intelligent, highly connected automation components featuring advanced sensorless control and native industrial Ethernet communications.
Bob Marshall is vice president of engineering and services, and Scott Fouracre is supplier product manager at Galco Industrial Electronics.
Can you explain what a decentralized drive is and how decentralized drives differ from centralized drive systems, in terms of installation, wiring complexity and maintenance?
Bob Marshall, vice president of engineering and services, Galco Industrial Electronics: A decentralized drive is a motor-drive arrangement in which the variable frequency drive (VFD) is installed close to, or directly on, the motor rather than in a central control cabinet. Compared to centralized systems, this approach can reduce panel size, shorten or eliminate long motor cable runs and lessen the burden on cabinet thermal management.
From an installation standpoint, decentralized drives can simplify machine design because they reduce the amount of wiring that must be routed back to a central enclosure. That also tends to reduce wiring complexity and make troubleshooting more straightforward. From a maintenance perspective, having the drive located nearer to the motor can make it easier to isolate issues and service individual sections of a machine or line.
What are some applications where decentralized drives might benefit an industrial system being designed and built?
Scott Fouracre, supplier product manager, Galco Industrial Electronics: Decentralized drives are especially useful in applications where motors are spread across a large machine or throughout a production line, or where a system requires many individual motors. In those environments, they can simplify installation, reduce wiring and improve serviceability.
Typical applications include conveyor systems, material handling equipment, packaging lines and airport baggage handling systems. In general, any application with distributed motion and multiple drive points can be a strong candidate for a decentralized architecture.
Servo motors have traditionally been preferred for high-precision, high-response applications. How might an inverter affect someone's evaluation of switching out servos for induction motors?
Bob Marshall, vice president of engineering and services, Galco Industrial Electronics: Modern inverter technology has significantly improved the performance of induction motor systems and narrowed the gap between those systems and servo-driven solutions in many applications. When paired with an advanced vector-controlled drive, a vector-duty induction motor can deliver very strong speed regulation and reliable control for a wide range of industrial processes.
That said, servo systems still remain the preferred choice for applications requiring the highest levels of positioning accuracy, dynamic response and repeatability. The evaluation really comes down to application requirements. If the process demands precise positioning and extremely fast response, a servo system is typically the better fit. If the need is for tightly regulated speed, dependable torque performance and a more cost-effective overall solution, an inverter-driven induction motor may be the better choice.
Get your subscription to Control Design’s daily newsletter.
For many applications, such as conveyors, pumps, fans and mixers, modern VFD-driven induction motor systems offer more than enough control performance while also providing advantages in cost, system simplicity and durability.
How have frequency inverters evolved over recent generations in terms of control features, communication protocols and energy efficiency?
Scott Fouracre, supplier product manager, Galco Industrial Electronics: Frequency inverters have evolved considerably over the years. Earlier generations were primarily based on simple V/Hz control and offered more limited performance and adjustability. Today’s drives incorporate advanced control methods such as vector control and direct torque control, supported by more powerful digital processing. That has enabled features such as sensorless control, auto-tuning, integrated diagnostics and built-in safety functions.
Communication has advanced just as significantly. Where older systems often depended on analog signals or more limited serial communications, modern inverters commonly support industrial Ethernet protocols such as EtherNet/IP, Profinet, EtherCAT, and Modbus TCP. This makes integration with programmable logic controllers (PLCs), human-machine interfaces (HMIs) and broader automation architectures much easier.
From an energy standpoint, modern inverters also help users operate motors more efficiently by matching motor output more closely to process demand, reducing wasted energy and improving overall system performance. As a result, the inverter has evolved from a basic speed-control device into a more intelligent, connected and efficient automation component.
Tell us about one of your company’s state-of-the-art products, if any, that involves drives, motors, inverters or digital twins.
Scott Fouracre, supplier product manager, Galco Industrial Electronics: One product worth highlighting is the SmartD Clean Power VFD, a variable frequency drive designed to address some of the traditional challenges associated with conventional VFD systems. Its design helps simplify installation while supporting motor performance and power quality in demanding industrial environments. For customers looking to improve drive system performance without adding unnecessary complexity, it represents a strong example of how drive technology continues to evolve.
About the Author
Mike Bacidore
Editor in Chief
Mike Bacidore is chief editor of Control Design and has been an integral part of the Endeavor Business Media editorial team since 2007. Previously, he was editorial director at Hughes Communications and a portfolio manager of the human resources and labor law areas at Wolters Kluwer. Bacidore holds a BA from the University of Illinois and an MBA from Lake Forest Graduate School of Management. He is an award-winning columnist, earning multiple regional and national awards from the American Society of Business Publication Editors. He may be reached at [email protected]




